Question
GDIT
US
Last activity: 1 Mar 2020 0:21 EST
Skins and Responsive Behavior
Came across this question and seeing an assortment of responses.
- "A" is one of the obvious choices.
- "B" would provide for consistency across all of the devices. But there isn't anything wrong with different skins on different portals. The user experience on the mobile device may very well be different than on a laptop.
- "C" I don't think there is an option to NOT use a skin. At the very minimum, would you default to the Out-of-Box skin, correct?
- "D" Providing a separate portal does not address the stakeholder requirements. You still need to address the stakeholder requirements. Not to mention, difficulty in maintaining separate portals. But by providing a different portal, you would definitely avoid impacting laptop users. I just don't like the wording of the option. Updating the process is misleading.
A & B or A & D? The question is about options and if you read the beginning of the questions, you are configuring the skin.
What are your thoughts?.
An online sales application supports both laptop and mobile devices. You are configuring the application skin and you notice the responsive layout in the mobile device is not displaying views as stakeholders require.
Which two options allow you to resolve this situation without negatively impacting the laptop users?
A. Adjust the responsive behavior in the skin for optimal viewing in the mobile portal.
B. Use the same application skin in all portals.
Came across this question and seeing an assortment of responses.
- "A" is one of the obvious choices.
- "B" would provide for consistency across all of the devices. But there isn't anything wrong with different skins on different portals. The user experience on the mobile device may very well be different than on a laptop.
- "C" I don't think there is an option to NOT use a skin. At the very minimum, would you default to the Out-of-Box skin, correct?
- "D" Providing a separate portal does not address the stakeholder requirements. You still need to address the stakeholder requirements. Not to mention, difficulty in maintaining separate portals. But by providing a different portal, you would definitely avoid impacting laptop users. I just don't like the wording of the option. Updating the process is misleading.
A & B or A & D? The question is about options and if you read the beginning of the questions, you are configuring the skin.
What are your thoughts?.
An online sales application supports both laptop and mobile devices. You are configuring the application skin and you notice the responsive layout in the mobile device is not displaying views as stakeholders require.
Which two options allow you to resolve this situation without negatively impacting the laptop users?
A. Adjust the responsive behavior in the skin for optimal viewing in the mobile portal.
B. Use the same application skin in all portals.
C. Do not use a skin for the mobile application version.
D. Update the process to give mobile users a separate portal
Updated: 14 Jun 2021 7:38 EDT
Pegasystems Inc.
IN
I think the option would be A and D.
D because when we are making changes for the separate portal, there won't be any negative impact on the laptop users.
I think the answer cannot be B because, if we use the same application skin for all portals, if we want to change the responsive behavior in the skin sometimes it may impact the laptop users.
Updated: 1 Mar 2020 0:21 EST
HCL Netherlands BV
NL
I think A and B make a more OOTB way of achieving these requirements of
1. having a device-specific responsive behavior and let Pega handle the screen size adjustments for laptop, tablet and mobile devices.
2. Keeping same portal and hence, maintaining a seamless experience for users across different devices.