Skip to main content

This content is closed to future replies and is no longer being maintained or updated.
Links may no longer function. If you have a similar request, please write a new post.

Question

 Shital Mitkari (ShitalM9)
Bank of America
VP
Bank of America
US
ShitalM9 Member since 2013 8 posts
Bank of America
Posted: Nov 8, 2022
Last activity: Dec 7, 2022
Posted: 8 Nov 2022 19:33 EST
Last activity: 7 Dec 2022 12:25 EST
Closed

AccountNumber column in work table removal

I want to enquire about Pega Smart Dispute for Acquirer (SDA) product’s view and recommendation.

As a part of SDA product I see AccountNumber column is exposed in SD work table. In my institution it is security violation and/or Nonpublic personal information (NPI) issue to have AccountNumber column as direct visible (exposed).

I want to know if this column can be removed as exposed and it will still be part of data in work table blob (pzpvstream) column?

How we can able to confirm if this ‘AccountNumber’ column can be removed as exposed and there will not be any impact for Acquirer dispute case processing.

Another alternative I need to see, if this column cannot be removed is, can we able to change the data type of this column in database. Currently it is set as Number(25). Attaching the screenshot. With dataType change, I then thinking to encrypt the AccountNumber which then will need to hold alphanumeric characters.

Can we able to change it to varchar without having any impact to SDA dispute case processing?

                                                                         

***Edited by Moderator: Pooja Gadige to add capability tag***
To see attachments, please log in.
Smart Dispute for Acquirers 7.48
Case Management
Data Model
Financial Services
Lead System Architect

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega Collaboration Center has detected you are using a browser which may prevent you from experiencing the site as intended. To improve your experience, please update your browser.

Close Deprecation Notice