Question
Pegasystems Inc.
US
Last activity: 16 Dec 2020 14:11 EST
Components Arrangement in Trigger_NBA_TopLevel
Is the arrangement of components in the attached screen shot of Trigger_NBA_TopLevel expected? In 8.4, this was a useful strategy rule for testing end-to-end strategy logic after making an update to an extension point. In 8.5, it is very difficult to interpret and needs to be rearranged each time I use it so the flow of actions is clear.
Accepted Solution
Updated: 16 Dec 2020 12:41 EST
Pegasystems Inc.
GB
Hi,
Yes this is not ideal and we need to improve this in future release. One tip I can give is that collapsing and expanding the embedded strategy shapes will help organise a little better.
Cheers, Alex
Pegasystems Inc.
US
Hi,
Additionally please note that our intent is for customers not to be opening up these rules. We totally understand that you might need to from time to time and we will fix the layout as indicated by the response above, but in the mean time, if you are opening it for the purpose of testing, consider the use of Persona tests that should meet that need without needing to open up the rule. You mentioned extension point, there should be no extensions in these rules, but maybe I'm missing your specific situation.