Skip to main content

This content is closed to future replies and is no longer being maintained or updated.
Links may no longer function. If you have a similar request, please write a new post.

Discussion

 Giridhar Metikal (Giridhar_Metikal)
BlueRose Technologies
Lead Consultant
BlueRose Technologies
AU
Giridhar_Metikal Member since 2014 101 posts
BlueRose Technologies
Posted: Nov 12, 2015
Last activity: Nov 13, 2015
Posted: 12 Nov 2015 10:29 EST
Last activity: 13 Nov 2015 5:11 EST
Closed

Query on SSA 7.1 Quiz question on Circumstance
I understand that the highlighted option is the correct answer. But what is wrong with last option? Can't we have two property based Circumstance rules? 
 
Question:
Assume that there are no other “ApproveLoan” or related rules other than those specified below. Which of the following scenarios is allowed by the system? (Choose One)
2 Rules: ApproveLoan (not circumstanced), ApproveLoan (.MortgageRate > 0.05)
1 Rule: ApproveLoan (.CreationDate As-of 1/1/2042)
2 Rules: ApproveLoan (not circumstanced), ApproveLoan (.OriginProvince = .PropertyProvince)
2 Rules: ApproveLoan (not circumstanced), ApproveLoan (Start Date: [blank], End Date: 12/31/2013)
==> 3 Rules: ApproveLoan (not circumstanced), ApproveLoan (.OriginProvince = Ontario), ApproveLoan (.AccountID = C1234)
To see attachments, please log in.
Pega Academy

Posted: 9 years ago
Posted: 13 Nov 2015 5:11 EST
Giridhar Metikal (Giridhar_Metikal)
BlueRose Technologies
Lead Consultant
BlueRose Technologies
AU

Oh! This means we cannot create circumstancing on multiple properties without Circumstance Template. This clarifies my query. Thanks a lot @ANDEM. :)

To see attachments, please log in.

Related content:

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega Collaboration Center has detected you are using a browser which may prevent you from experiencing the site as intended. To improve your experience, please update your browser.

Close Deprecation Notice