Elastic Search alternative to exposing properties for reporting
Has anyone tried passing report definitions into pxRetrieveSearchData to query against Elastic Search, as opposed to the usual exposing of db columns for reporting? This would be for the purpose of avoiding exposing columns and the potential performance issues once too many columns need exposed to meet customer needs. Just trying to see if I'm in new territory here, or if this 'wheel' has already been created and proven out.
***Edited by Moderator Marissa to add SR Details***
Accepted Solution
Pegasystems Inc.
NL
V7 search API (pxRetrieveSearchData) requires class and report definition name as a parameter.
List fields that are defined in report definition are returned in search results and Filters that are defined in report definition are appended to search filters.
BTW, it only works with List report(Summary/rank/etc is not supported)
Also in customer's case, they will have to create or update data transform/data instance pySearchModel to include properties that they want to retrieve in search results(retrieval of standard properties is by default supported). Any changes to pySearchModel requires full re-indexing of given class.
Last but not the least assuming customer has work class, indexing should be enabled on work class for search to work.
Regards
Toyota Financial Services
AU
Hi,
Elastic search/Lucene Search is in the file system of the server. Below are the important steps to be considered, while implementing the solution using Elastic search
- Custom search properties rule form need to be configured for the respective work class, with all required properties to be filtered on.
- Create the report definition with all required properties to be returned and called using the "pxRetrieveSearchData" activity
- As Elastic search is on file system index file and flat structured, Query filters in the report definition cannot use embedded page list.
Thanks
Sandeep P V