Skip to main content

This content is closed to future replies and is no longer being maintained or updated.
Links may no longer function. If you have a similar request, please write a new post.

Question

 Ayesha Saeed (Ayeshasaeedhaq) SiriusXM
SiriusXM
US
Ayeshasaeedhaq Member since 2016 10 posts
SiriusXM
Posted: Nov 29, 2021
Last activity: Mar 24, 2022
Posted: 29 Nov 2021 13:16 EST
Last activity: 24 Mar 2022 9:13 EDT
Closed

CDH ADM configuration

Report

ADMs are configured /designed based on how pygroups, channels etc are used in the deployment. I was wondering what level of granularity is the ideal for an ADM. Do we have any best practices and benchmarks around that?

Pega Adaptive Decision Manager Agent Desktop Communications and Media Data Scientist
Posted: 1 year ago
Posted: 24 Mar 2022 9:13 EDT
Sara Shishehchi (shiss) Senior Principal Data Scientist, Machine Learning & AI
Pegasystems Inc.
US
Report

@Ayeshasaeedhaq   Hi, I guess your question is about the ADM context setting. According to NBA-D best practices, the context is pyIssu-pyGroup-pyDirection-pyChannel-pyName-pyTreatment. The granularity level is down to the treatment level. This is the best practice however, depending on certain use cases, the context can be changed. For example, if treatment level data is not sufficient to have proper models, or business preferences to model at higher levels etc.

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega Collaboration Center has detected you are using a browser which may prevent you from experiencing the site as intended. To improve your experience, please update your browser.

Close Deprecation Notice