Skip to main content

This content is closed to future replies and is no longer being maintained or updated.
Links may no longer function. If you have a similar request, please write a new post.

Question

 Manthripragada Manikanta Sriram (Sriram75)
Staid Logic
Lead System Architect
Staid Logic
US
Sriram75 Member since 2008 10 posts
Staid Logic
Posted: Nov 21, 2015
Last activity: Nov 23, 2015
Posted: 21 Nov 2015 17:35 EST
Last activity: 23 Nov 2015 3:47 EST
Closed
Solved

After second skim (i.e. 01 -01-01 to 02-01 ; 02-01 to 03-01) the withdrawn rules became Yes ... oops :) any SR/Hotfix

After second skim (i.e. 01 -01-01 to 02-01 ; 02-01 to 03-01) the withdrawn rules became Yes . we had a minor skim also in between, i.e. 02-01 to 02-02 that was worked find. version : Pega 7.1.6

To see attachments, please log in.
System Administration

Accepted Solution

Posted: 9 years ago
Posted: 21 Nov 2015 23:30 EST
Santanu Bhattacherjee (Santanu) Senior Manager, Cloud Engineering, Management Plane Services
Pegasystems Inc.
IN

Hi

This article says : https://collaborate.pega.com/question/how-populate-grid-through-acivity  that there is a HFIX for this on 7.1.7 and it got permanently fixed in 7.1.8

I am not sure about 7.1.6 . You can either chose to update to latest ML release ( recommended )  where it got permanently fixed or you can contact Global Customer Support by raising an SR, if you want to pursue the HFIX route ( not recommended though ).

To see attachments, please log in.

We'd prefer it if you saw us at our best.

Pega Collaboration Center has detected you are using a browser which may prevent you from experiencing the site as intended. To improve your experience, please update your browser.

Close Deprecation Notice