ML9 New Alert Fields?
Has the alert log file format changed between ML8 and ML9?
The help file at this URL is clearly wrong - it defines a format that corresponds to PRPC 6.x.
https://community.pega.com/sites/default/files/help_v719/procomhelpmain.htm
***Updated by Moderator: Marissa to add Doc Bug group tag***
**Moderation Team has archived post**
This post has been archived for educational purposes. Contents and links will no longer be updated. If you have the same/similar question, please write a new post.
Pegasystems Inc.
US
Eric,
Plaese use the link to guide you entering a doc bug: Submitting a documentation bug
Accepted Solution
Pegasystems Inc.
GB
Hi Eric,
Thanks for the link: this appears simply to be inaccurate:
It says:
B Version Displays as "6".
Which is incorrect for 719: which (I just checked a 719 system here) actually shows as '8':
2016-01-31 00:02:09,819 GMT*8*PEGA0055*13811[...]
I *believe* the number in position two of alerts is showing the version of the ALERT format : which *roughly* corresponds to the version of PRPC; but *probably* only gets incremented when a change is made to the actual ALERT format itself.
(Rather than say a new alert-type being added).
I'm pretty sure that the format of alerts has not changed between 718 and 719.
https://pdn.pega.com/sites/pdn.pega.com/files/help_v719[...]
Cheers
John
I have logged a Feedback Item for the incorrect Help page:
FDBK-14075 "Alert Version Field is incorrectly defined in 719 help"
Pegasystems Inc.
US
this should be bug not an enhancement request.
Pegasystems Inc.
IT
Even fields are not correct for track record version 8 in the Help page.
The right list of fields (which are much more) is here:
Pegasystems
US
Thank you all for your help, I have submitted a bug report, pointing out that the issue with the help file applies to all PRPC 7 releases, not just ML9.
Hi Eric,
Could you let us know the BUG ID so that we may track it here?
Thanks in advance,
Lochan
Pegasystems
US
Hi Lochana,
Sorry for the delay - Bug Id: BUG-233479
Thanks Eric!